Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
NC State University Libraries Logo
    Communities & Collections
    Browse NC State Repository
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Dr. James Burrow, Committee Co-Chair"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    The Impact of Moral Reasoning on the Performance of Salespeople.
    (2005-05-06) Shank, Mark J.; Dr. James Burrow, Committee Co-Chair
    Cognitive Moral Development theory was first developed by Jean Piaget in order to explain the mental processes that occur when deriving meaning from experience. From this theory, Lawrence Kohlberg developed the hypothesis that the higher the moral reasoning, the higher the ethical decision. Previous studies suggest that the sales representative works in an environment that is prone to unethical behavior. Examples of this unethical behavior include lying to the customer, not keeping promises and selling ineffective solutions. Researchers suggest that this damaging behavior has been largely attributed to the relative isolation and high pressure that the sales representative experiences in the field. As a result, this behavior can lead to a large variety of consequences that can have a marked impact on a company's performance and financial success. The consequences to the company and the sales representative include loss of customer trust, employee turnover, reduction in repeat business, and lawsuits. To avoid these outcomes, sales managers have a fundamental need to identify mechanisms that increase ethical decision-making. A first step is to understand the relationship between sales performance and morality in the decision making process. The objective of this study was to provide a first order assessment of the existence of a relationship between sales performance and moral reasoning. Specifically, the study assessed whether or not a sales representative's performance, measured by the three-year average sales quota achieved, had a positive correlation with cognitive moral development. Demographic variables; income, education, years of sales experience and ethics training were also analyzed to determine if there was any relationship with cognitive moral development. The survey data was gathered from a sample of 63 sales representatives in an international pharmaceutical company. The sales representatives completed two questionnaires. The Defining Issues Test-2 was used to measure an individual's cognitive moral development level and a self-reported demographic questionnaire was created to gather information around income, performance, education and ethics training. Findings indicate that there is no correlation between a sales representative's performance and cognitive moral development. While previous research has indicated that demographic variables such as income, highest educational degree earned and years of experience, have a positive relationship with cognitive moral development, this study was not consistent with these findings. The one variable, participation in formal ethics training did show a significant relationship with cognitive moral development among sales representatives. This suggests that participation in ethics training increases the likelihood of a sales representative having a higher level of moral reasoning.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    A Merger Case Study of Learning and Change: Exploring the Relationships Between Learning Styles and Change Orientation to Enhance Learning Interventions
    (2006-05-09) Tredway, Ron; Dr. James Burrow, Committee Co-Chair; Dr. Paula K. Berardinelli, Committee Chair; Dr. Don Martin, Committee Member; Dr. Conrad Glass, Committee Member
    This exploratory case study investigated the relationships between change orientation [readiness] scores and learning styles, of individuals within an organization undergoing complex change — mergers and acquisitions (M&A). The intent to understand where a learning intervention could be applied in a prioritized manner, in the area of greatest need — low change readiness, and most dominant learning style, was achieved. The study therefore adds to the change integration, and M&A literature, an exploration of individual change and learning tendencies and their collaborative use in intervention design and development, within an observed M&A environment; a medium-sized east coast company in the health sciences profession. Understanding change readiness and ways to positively influence change outcomes in organizations dealing with complex change remains a strategic factor in helping organizations realize synergies and achieve competitive advantage, especially in M&A environments. While learning interventions continue to be a primary strategy used by change organizations to influence effective change results, these organizations seek intervention efficiency and effectiveness. Learning interventions based on learners' [change recipients'] learning styles, helps ensure learning acceptance and application, which enhances organizational change integration. Quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis were included in the study design. Quantitative change and learning data were collected through an online survey, with items adapted by permission from the Organization Change Orientation Scale (Jones and Bearley, 1986) and the Learning Style Inventory (Kolb, 1999), and analyzed using SAS 8.0 GLM. Qualitative data were collected through interviewing 10 randomly selected change recipients from the organization using a metaphor elicitation technique, and analyzed through coding to understand cultural norms, employee learning needs, organizational goals, and perception of the acquisitions. Investigation involved; 1) determination of the critical learning needs perceived by organizational managers and non-managers to ensure successful acquisition integration, 2) the identification of change readiness scores and learning styles of change recipients, 3) determination of how these scores and styles were distributed across the population investigated, 4) assessment of the relationships between change readiness scores and the individual learning styles among change recipients in the organization, and 5) assessment of the relationships between change readiness scores and demographic variables - organizational entities, gender, age, race, function, management, and job change. Concluded from the analysis, three frequently mentioned learning needs for acquisition integration were identified, supporting evidence of need for ongoing intervention development. Supporting intervention prioritization, one or more significant differences were found on each of the research questions. Change readiness scores of the original organization were significantly lower than the latest acquisition, and change recipients with the Converging learning style had significantly lower change readiness scores than those with the Accommodating learning style. Low readiness scores were also found among Males, Caucasians, and technical job functions such as IT-Programmers, while high readiness change scores were found among females, managers and change recipients over age 45. The conclusions of this study have implications for understanding the change readiness level and learning style of change recipients simultaneously, as a technique for prioritizing and enhancing the development of learning interventions during complex organizational change. Three learning interventions were warranted in this situation, and learning intervention prioritization and development suggested for the organization based on these findings. Benefits to human resources, human resource development, organization development and line management leaders are implied, suggesting further application and research opportunities.

Contact

D. H. Hill Jr. Library

2 Broughton Drive
Campus Box 7111
Raleigh, NC 27695-7111
(919) 515-3364

James B. Hunt Jr. Library

1070 Partners Way
Campus Box 7132
Raleigh, NC 27606-7132
(919) 515-7110

Libraries Administration

(919) 515-7188

NC State University Libraries

  • D. H. Hill Jr. Library
  • James B. Hunt Jr. Library
  • Design Library
  • Natural Resources Library
  • Veterinary Medicine Library
  • Accessibility at the Libraries
  • Accessibility at NC State University
  • Copyright
  • Jobs
  • Privacy Statement
  • Staff Confluence Login
  • Staff Drupal Login

Follow the Libraries

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
  • Snapchat
  • LinkedIn
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube
  • YouTube Archive
  • Flickr
  • Libraries' news

ncsu libraries snapchat bitmoji

×