Browsing by Author "Sarah T. Warren, Committee Member"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Determining Criteria and Indicators for Success in Higher Education Programs Focused on Environmental Sustainability
    (2008-11-14) Grecho, April Stephanie; Matthew M. Booker, Committee Member; Sarah T. Warren, Committee Member; Gary B. Blank, Committee Chair; Susan E. Moore, Committee Member
    An increasing number of colleges and universities in the United States are restructuring courses and research programs to focus on long-term use and maintenance of our resources and protecting these resources for future generations. It is important that students be given the resources and tools necessary to create positive change for the pressing issues facing out local, regional, and global environments. I believe and established that an evaluation framework is necessary if academic programs focused on the issue of environmental sustainability are to remain viable into the next century. Previous research and assessment on environmental sustainability and higher education has focused on the role of the university in sustainable development, improving environmental track records of institutions, and environmental conservation and sustainability on campus. The purpose of this study was to develop a framework for evaluation, using criteria and indicators, for academic programs in higher education that are focused on environmental sustainability. The first objective to develop a framework for evaluation was met through a participatory process involving academic program stakeholders. The second objective to test the applicability of the framework for evaluation investigated a diversity of academic programs through nine case studies of land grant, regional, and private colleges and universities across the U.S. This study demonstrated that educational stakeholders are aware of the need and interested in evaluating success of academic programs aimed at addressing the issue of environmental sustainability. Specifically, I determined 5 criteria and the associated strategic indicators to be used as a framework for academic program evaluation. These criteria and indicators serve a number of purposes by providing a set of key terms that can be used in future educational program evaluation or assessment, a framework against which programs can evaluate their effectiveness, and a means for making changes and adapting, or to resolving areas of weakness.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Understanding the Adoption of Sustainable Natural Resource Management Practices and the Role of Ecological Design Within the Milieu of Chronic Conflict and Political Instability: A Case Study of Smallholder Households in Nimba County, Liberia
    (2004-12-01) Van Der Wiele, Cynthia Fay; Sarah T. Warren, Committee Member; Toddi A. Steelman, Committee Member; Robin C. Moore, Committee Co-Chair; Shishir Rajan Raval, Committee Chair
    This dissertation is about the adoption of sustainable natural resource management (NRM) practices, in particular about rural, subsistence-level smallholder households' decision-making within the milieu of enduring disorder and persistent poverty. The goal is to better understand the role of design—broadly considered as a decision-making and problem-solving activity or intervention that affects quality of landscape and quality of life—in such a context. The overarching question is whether and how external assistance, within the field of community and environmental design, can be used more effectively to enable smallholder households to secure their basic needs, promote self-reliance, and adopt sustainable NRM practices as a means of breaking the unending cycle of natural resource degradation and persistent poverty. It is indisputable that the attention of the relief and development community should focus on making interventions both relief and development-oriented. A sustainable livelihoods framework served to illuminate the interrelationships between households and biophysical and social landscapes, and the corresponding constraints and opportunities to adoption of NRM practices. Three fundamental themes of this dissertation are: (1) the interaction between natural resources and rural livelihoods; (2) the influence of chronic conflict and political instability on rural livelihoods; and (3) the role and mission of community and ecological design. While the sustainable livelihoods approach has been applied in many locales around the world, there is a dearth of information in settings experiencing chronic conflict and political instability and how this milieu affects rural households' decision-making and ability to make conservation investments. This research was accomplished with a case study of 55 individuals from four villages in upper Nimba County, Liberia, who attended an 18-week Integrated Pest Management-Farmer Field School (IPM-FFS). The training included seven low-external input and sustainable agriculture (LEISA) practices and two productive conservation practices. A grounded theory approach with complementary research techniques to incorporate qualitative and quantitative data collection was employed. Respondents completed in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Photo-documented field observations and interviews with key informants were used to verify and supplement data provided by IPM-FFS participants. Two dominant themes emerged from the data: (1) whether or not the NRM practices were compatible with perceived or real vulnerability; and (2) the role of household assets in promoting or inhibiting adoption. Permeating these two themes are relationships with cultural traditions, beliefs, and power that can help explain how households are positioned with respect to vulnerability and assets, and whether they adopted the NRM practices. Chronic conflict and political instability present a challenge. Providing 'developmental relief' to households and communities is akin to ecosystem recovery following a perturbation. The flux between periods of peak crisis and stability present numerous opportunities for 'developmental relief' interventions beginning with training opportunities in refugee camps. The grounded theories regarding adoption under uncertainty are: 1) potential NRM practices must be compatible with predominant livelihood strategies and address sources of vulnerability; 2) anything that increases a household's exposure to risk—or their perceptions of exposure to risk—will seem less attractive, even if it could potentially provide dependable and lucrative sources of income; and 3) NRM practices will not succeed without a commitment to low input requirements—especially financial requirements—for households to be able to adopt. Appropriate ecological design interventions include context-specific agro-ecosystem diversity, farmscaping, and the use of home gardens for small-scale experimentation of new NRM practices.