Natural Variation of Hydrology in Nonrivierine Wet Hardwood Forests and the Implications for Restoration

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Theodore Henry Shear, Committee Co-Chair en_US
dc.contributor.advisor April Lynda James, Committee Co-Chair en_US
dc.contributor.advisor Joshua L. Heitman, Committee Member en_US
dc.contributor.author Johnson, Yari Ben en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-02T18:01:40Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-02T18:01:40Z
dc.date.issued 2010-01-15 en_US
dc.identifier.other etd-01082010-164831 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/1175
dc.description.abstract Wetland restoration projects across the United States are failing. Restored sites commonly lack the species and hydrology of the targeted community being restored. A better understanding of natural wetlands would help restoration project designers achieve community composition and hydrologic regimes that more closely resemble natural conditions. I investigated two different methods to identify patterns in hydrologic regime useful to restoration design. The first method was based on success criteria commonly used by North Carolina wetland mitigation projects. The second method was based on The Nature Conservancy’s Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration. In order to test these two methods, I collected hydrologic and compositional data across the natural variation of nonriverine wet hardwood forest stands, a rare wetland community type commonly restored in North Carolina. My results show that hydrologic parameters from the first method, based on current success criteria used in North Carolina, are not related to community composition. Hydrologic parameters from the second method, e.g. the maximum water table level over a 3-day span, explained much of the variation in nonriverine wet hardwood forest community composition. My results found that clear relationships do exist between hydrologic regime and community composition. Hydrologic parameters that are related to community composition need to be used as success criteria in future restoration designs. This will ensure that projects establish the appropriate hydrologic regime necessary to foster the desired wetland community type. en_US
dc.rights I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. en_US
dc.subject nonriverine wet hardwood forests en_US
dc.subject forested wetlands en_US
dc.subject wetland restoration en_US
dc.subject hydrology en_US
dc.subject ecological restoration en_US
dc.title Natural Variation of Hydrology in Nonrivierine Wet Hardwood Forests and the Implications for Restoration en_US
dc.degree.name MS en_US
dc.degree.level thesis en_US
dc.degree.discipline Natural Resources en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
etd.pdf 539.7Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record