Exploring the Dimensionality of Performance in the Army Special Forces

Show full item record

Title: Exploring the Dimensionality of Performance in the Army Special Forces
Author: Ellington, James Kemp
Advisors: M.A. Wilson, Committee Member
J.W. Cunningham, Committee Chair
D.W. Drewes, Committee Member
Abstract: The purpose of this research was to explore the dimensionality of performance in the Army Special Forces (SF) using three separate data sources. A job analysis of the SF revealed 15 categories of performance common to all SF soldiers, in addition to 47 human attributes necessary to perform the behaviors associated with each category. A sample of SF soldiers was rated on their performance of the 15 categories using behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS). Furthermore, a panel of subject matter experts (SME) rated each performance dimension on its requirement for each of the human attributes. These two data sources served in the development of two sets of performance dimensions, based on respective factor and cluster analyses of the data. A third data source included job analyst sorting data of the 15 performance categories into predefined numbers of groups. This data was also cluster analyzed to produce a third set of performance dimensions. Research questions focused predominantly on the number of performance dimensions that would be derived from the three data sources and their interpretability, and the extent to which agreement would exist between the three sources. Agreement was determined based on an index of cluster overlap for comparing two cluster solutions. Three dimensions were chosen as most interpretable from the performance ratings and a four-dimension solution was chosen based on the analyses of the attribute requirement ratings. The clusters derived from the analyst sorting data were difficult to interpret. The highest level of cluster overlap existed between the clusters derived from the performance ratings and the attribute requirement ratings. Overall, the three-dimension conception of performance was chosen as most meaningful. The dimensions were interpreted and named General Soldiering, Citizenship Performance, and SF Specific Performance. Comparisons were made with previously developed performance models, and recommendations were made for future research.
Date: 2002-08-14
Degree: MS
Discipline: Psychology
URI: http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/1973


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
etd.pdf 403.6Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record