Development of a Comfort Measurement Matrix

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Dr. William Oxenham, Committee Chair en_US
dc.contributor.author Burchett, Melissa Maud en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-02T17:53:47Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-02T17:53:47Z
dc.date.issued 2008-04-26 en_US
dc.identifier.other etd-03192007-100407 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/197
dc.description.abstract Comfort has been shown to be a key determinant in textile product sales, yet as a concept, it is elusive. Comfort is comprised of a series of interactions with the human body and its environment. Comfort thus varies by end-use and the individual whims of the wearer or user. In order to study comfort, efforts were begun with fabric hand. The Kawabata Evaluation System (KES-F) is known as the most complete method of evaluation for fabric hand and comfort characteristics, however, the breadth of information, time, and expense involved in this system has rendered it obsolete for use by the US textile industry, especially within the manufacturing environment. The current research is thus focused on the development of a more simplistic objective test method, and one that is suited to the needs of the industry. Two methods were identified for use in this research as potential alternatives to KES-F. These are the CSIRO Fabric Assurance by Simple Testing (FAST) and a Ring Pull-Through method. Trials were run on six fabric types, all six of which displayed variations in finishing treatments. Results from the two objective methods were compared to rankings from a subjective fabric hand evaluation, conducted in the College of Textiles at North Carolina State University. The results suggested that the Ring Pull-Through method was able to discriminate between styles of a fabric type at a similar resolution to that of subjective evaluations. Additionally, multiple regression models for all test data showed the strongest correlations between subjective preference data and FAST-3 extension variables. Ring Pull-Through peak load and area values also showed strong negative correlations with FAST-3 extension ratings, indicating the combined use of the Ring Pull-Through device and an extension test as a promising predictor of subjective comfort preferences. en_US
dc.rights I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. en_US
dc.subject Ring Pull-Through en_US
dc.subject comfort en_US
dc.subject fabric hand en_US
dc.subject fabric handle en_US
dc.subject objective measurement en_US
dc.subject Fabric Assurance by Simple Testing (FAST) en_US
dc.title Development of a Comfort Measurement Matrix en_US
dc.degree.name MS en_US
dc.degree.level thesis en_US
dc.degree.discipline Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
etd.pdf 2.174Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record