A Life-Cycle Analysis of Alternatives for the Management of Waste Hot-Mix Asphalt, Commercial Food Waste, and Construction and Demolition Waste.
No Thumbnail Available
Files
Date
2008-12-03
Authors
Journal Title
Series/Report No.
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Effective management of commercially generated food waste presents an opportunity for
avoided global warming potential, renewable energy production, and renewable
agrochemical production. The vast majority of food waste is landfilled, but source separated
collection of the organic fraction of municipal waste is becoming more common. Currently in
the US, food waste that is not buried in a landfill is aerobically composted and the end
product has the potential to be used as a soil amendment that can replace mineral fertilizers
or other agrochemicals. In Europe, anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic wastes is more
common. AD facilities produce methane that can be used as an energy source. The residual
from AD can also be used as a soil amendment similar to what is produced at composting
facilities.
An LCI was performed for food waste processed through several aerobic composting
systems, an AD facility, and a landfill with and without energy recovery. The functional unit
was one ton of food waste plus 0.6 tons of yard waste. The yard waste was considered
because it is used as a bulking agent in food waste composting processes. The AD alternative
was superior in every category due to the efficient collection of the methane generated and its
conversion to energy. The two landfilling alternatives resulted in the highest GWP although
the landfill with energy recovery alternative had the second lowest emissions and energy use.
The composting alternatives were superior relative to the landfilling without energy recovery
alternative.
C&D waste is solid waste generated during the construction, renovation, or demolition of
buildings and other structures. A life-cycle model was developed to evaluate two alternatives
for the management of C&D waste; (1) recycling (2) and landfill disposal. The C&D waste
LCI considered the recovery of ten materials present in a mixed C&D waste stream. All of
the materials except for wallboard and miscellaneous materials are recovered for beneficial
use. All of the recovered materials except for wood are assumed to replace virgin materials.
Wood is assumed to be burned in a co-fired coal plant to produce electricity. The results of
this analysis indicate that recovering mixed C&D leads to significant reductions in emissions,
energy use, and GWP when compared to landfill disposal of mixed C&D waste.
Description
Keywords
construction and demolition waste, food waste, hot-mix asphalt, life cycle assessment, solid waste
Citation
Degree
MS
Discipline
Civil Engineering
