Teacher Acceptability of Treatment Plan Implementation Monitoring and Feedback Methods

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor William Erchul, Committee Chair en_US
dc.contributor.advisor John Begeny, Committee Member en_US
dc.contributor.advisor Ann Schulte, Committee Member en_US
dc.contributor.author Easton, Julia Elizabeth en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-02T18:17:02Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-02T18:17:02Z
dc.date.issued 2009-07-22 en_US
dc.identifier.other etd-05132009-111907 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/2744
dc.description.abstract Treatment plan implementation (TPI) monitoring and feedback methods have increased TPI levels in single subject designs (e.g., DiGennaro, Martens, & McIntyre, 2005) and a randomized field trial (e.g., Noell, Witt, Slider, Connell, Gatti, et al., 2005). However, when procedures like these are innovative and require significant changes in regular practices, the level of teacher satisfaction is an important consideration (Eckert & Hintze, 2000), and the extent to which teachers view various monitoring and feedback methods as acceptable is unknown. The purposes of this research were to examine teachers’ acceptability ratings of specific TPI monitoring and feedback methods, differences in acceptability ratings between teachers with certain characteristics, and other TPI support methods that teachers identify. In this study, teachers completed a survey that assesses acceptability of specific monitoring and feedback methods, gathers information on various teacher characteristics, and provides teachers with an opportunity to write about other potential methods of TPI support. Results from this study suggested that there are significant differences between acceptability ratings regarding the personnel involved, frequency, communication format, and procedures of TPI monitoring and feedback methods. There was also a significant effect of primary teaching assignment on acceptability of TPI monitoring methods. Finally, teachers identified a variety of other potentially helpful TPI support methods. en_US
dc.rights I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. en_US
dc.subject treatment plan implementation en_US
dc.subject feedback en_US
dc.subject acceptability en_US
dc.title Teacher Acceptability of Treatment Plan Implementation Monitoring and Feedback Methods en_US
dc.degree.name MS en_US
dc.degree.level thesis en_US
dc.degree.discipline Psychology en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
etd.pdf 339.4Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record