Garbage or Godsend?: Contested Meanings Among Conservation and Humanitarian Groups on the United States Border

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor M. Nils Peterson, Committee Chair en_US
dc.contributor.advisor Erin Sills, Committee Member en_US
dc.contributor.advisor Fred Cubbage, Committee Member en_US Shellabarger, Rachel Marie en_US 2010-04-02T17:52:47Z 2010-04-02T17:52:47Z 2010-03-23 en_US
dc.identifier.other etd-12072009-223639 en_US
dc.description.abstract Conservation and human rights are currently threatened by direct and indirect effects of border enforcement practices on the Arizona-Sonora border. Increased border enforcement in urban areas has pushed migrants into remote conservation areas, threatening both the vulnerable borderland ecosystems and the human migrants passing through them. This study examines responses to human and environmental impacts of border policies in the case study region of Altar Valley in southern Arizona, where migrant traffic has increased greatly as a result of the expanded border enforcement near urban centers. We use ethnographic methods to explore and understand the actions of land-management and humanitarian aid groups attempting to address the socio-ecological crises wrought by increased border enforcement, in order to look for ways to reduce the crises through a better understanding of the context. Community partners include the Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge, the Coronado National Forest, and the No More Deaths humanitarian aid group, all located within 25 miles of the Arizona-Sonora border. The results of this study, carried out largely during the summer of 2008, describe how the actions of land-management and humanitarian groups eventually conflicted and resulted in littering citations for the humanitarian aid volunteers who left water for migrants along trails on the wildlife refuge. The conflict was branded as an issue of conservation versus human rights. I argue that the conflict between land-management personnel and humanitarian aid volunteers arose not just from differing conservation and humanitarian goals, but from their different conceptions of problems associated with border activity and different ideas of the borderlands as a place. en_US
dc.rights I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. en_US
dc.subject conservation en_US
dc.subject human rights en_US
dc.subject border enforcement en_US
dc.title Garbage or Godsend?: Contested Meanings Among Conservation and Humanitarian Groups on the United States Border en_US MS en_US thesis en_US Natural Resources en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
etd.pdf 658.4Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record