Topics in Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials (DRAFT)

Show full item record

Title: Topics in Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials (DRAFT)
Author: Lokhnygina, Yuliya
Advisors: Marie Davidian, Committee Member
Dennis Boos, Committee Member
Anastasios A. Tsiatis, Committee Chair
Daowen Zhang, Committee Member
Abstract: In the first part of this dissertation we derive optimal two-stage adaptive group-sequential designs for normally distributed data which achieve the minimum of a mixture of expected sample sizes at the range of plausible values of a normal mean. Unlike standard group-sequential tests, our method is adaptive in that it allows the group size at the second look to be a function of the observed test statistic at the first look. Using optimality criteria, we construct two-stage designs which we show have advantage over other popular adaptive methods. The employed computational method is a modification of the backward induction algorithm applied to a Bayesian decision problem. Two-stage randomization designs (TSRD) are becoming increasingly common in oncology and AIDS clinical trials as they make more efficient use of study participants to examine therapeutic regimens. In these designs patients are initially randomized to an induction treatment, followed by randomization to a maintenance treatment conditional on their induction response and consent to further study treatment. Broader acceptance of TSRDs in drug development may hinge on the ability to make appropriate intent-to-treat type inference as to whether an experimental induction regimen is better than a standard regimen in the absence of maintenance treatment within this design framework. Lunceford, Davidian, and Tsiatis (2002, Biometrics 58, 48-57) introduced an inverse-probability-weighting based analytical framework for estimating survival distributions and mean restricted survival times, as well as for comparing treatment policies in the TSRD setting. In practice Cox regression is widely used, and in the second part of this dissertation we extend the analytical framework of Lunceford et. al. to derive a consistent estimator for the log hazard in the Cox model and a robust score test to compare treatment policies. Large sample properties of these methods are derived and illustrated via a simulation study. Considerations regarding the application of TSRDs compared to single randomization designs are discussed.
Date: 2005-08-04
Degree: PhD
Discipline: Statistics

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
etd.pdf 288.9Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record