Selected Employee Attributes And Perceptions Regarding Methods And Animal Welfare Concerns Associated With Swine Euthanasia

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Dr. Richard T. Liles, Committee Chair en_US Matthis, John Steven en_US 2010-04-02T19:05:49Z 2010-04-02T19:05:49Z 2005-08-12 en_US
dc.identifier.other etd-05192004-151852 en_US
dc.description.abstract The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between selected employee attributes and employees' perceptions regarding swine euthanasia, and to explore employees' animal welfare concerns associated with swine euthanasia. This study establishes the most prevalent personality types among swine workers in Eastern North Carolina. The majority of the respondents have a personality type of ESTJ based on the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II. The following independent factors were used to determine an employee's willingness to perform euthanasia and attitude toward euthanasia. These factors include socio-demographic factors, socio-psychological factors, farm factors, and euthanasia methods. The information was obtained by visiting 47 swine farms in eastern North Carolina, where a total of 388 surveys were administered with a 100% return rate. The results of the survey concluded that ethnic background and gender affect the employee's attitude toward euthanasia. Females, Spanish-speaking employees, and employees with an SJ temperament type have a more negative attitude toward euthanizing pigs. Regardless of their age, gender, or ethnic background, employees prefer a method of euthanasia that is perceived as less painful to the pig. Most of the employees did not feel stressed by having to perform euthanasia as long as the animal appeared sick. Most of the employees perceived euthanasia of a sick pig as a humane alternative to letting the animal die naturally. A majority of employees perceived blunt trauma to be the safest current method for the 1- to 12-pound pig; however, carbon dioxide gas is perceived to be safer than blunt trauma or the bolt gun method of euthanasia. Most respondents did not have a problem performing euthanasia as a part of their daily job functions, but the longer an employee euthanizes pigs, the less willing he or she is to euthanize. Employees viewed euthanasia training as beneficial. Employees requested more euthanasia training and preferred the training be completed on the farm by a company trainer or farm manager. en_US
dc.rights I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. en_US
dc.subject Human Perceptions en_US
dc.subject Employee Attitudes en_US
dc.subject Swine Euthanasia en_US
dc.subject Animal Welfare en_US
dc.title Selected Employee Attributes And Perceptions Regarding Methods And Animal Welfare Concerns Associated With Swine Euthanasia en_US EdD en_US dissertation en_US Occupational Education en_US

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
etd.pdf 3.794Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record