Situational Judgment: An Investigation of Its Process and Relationship to Scholar Performance
dc.contributor.advisor | Dr. Samuel B. Pond, Committee Member | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Dr. Katherine Klein, Committee Member | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Dr. Mark Wilson, Committee Chair | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Dr. Donald Drewes, Committee Member | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Krokos, Kelley J. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-02T19:01:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-02T19:01:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-04-09 | en_US |
dc.degree.discipline | Psychology | en_US |
dc.degree.level | dissertation | en_US |
dc.degree.name | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Considerable disagreement exists regarding the nature of situational judgment and its relationship to performance. The purpose of this research is to address this disagreement. First, this research addresses lack of agreement regarding the nature of situational judgment by proposing that research to date has focused inappropriately on the final test score. More specifically, this research proposes that situational judgment can be shown to be a function of various cognitive processing tasks. A situational judgment inventory with embedded cognitive processing questions was developed to address these issues. The data do not support the models as proposed. After significant modification, situation awareness was the only cognitive processing variable to show promise as a predictor of situational judgment scores. Likely reasons include inappropriate operationalization of the factors. This research also examines the relationship of situational judgment to performance in a group of university scholarship recipients. Situational judgment was proposed to be a partial mediator between accepted performance predictors and three performance criteria. The data do not support the model as hypothesized. After significant modification, the situational judgment scores were still not predictive of performance. Likely reasons for the lack of predictive validity include the nature of situational judgment, the nature of the sample, and methodological weaknesses. Implications for future research are discussed. | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | etd-03312003-225248 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/4841 | |
dc.rights | I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. | en_US |
dc.subject | personnel selection | en_US |
dc.subject | performance | en_US |
dc.subject | cognitive processes | en_US |
dc.subject | situation awareness | en_US |
dc.subject | performance appraisal | en_US |
dc.subject | situational judgment | en_US |
dc.title | Situational Judgment: An Investigation of Its Process and Relationship to Scholar Performance | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1