Situational Judgment: An Investigation of Its Process and Relationship to Scholar Performance

dc.contributor.advisorDr. Samuel B. Pond, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Katherine Klein, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Mark Wilson, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Donald Drewes, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorKrokos, Kelley J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T19:01:57Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T19:01:57Z
dc.date.issued2005-04-09en_US
dc.degree.disciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.degree.leveldissertationen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.description.abstractConsiderable disagreement exists regarding the nature of situational judgment and its relationship to performance. The purpose of this research is to address this disagreement. First, this research addresses lack of agreement regarding the nature of situational judgment by proposing that research to date has focused inappropriately on the final test score. More specifically, this research proposes that situational judgment can be shown to be a function of various cognitive processing tasks. A situational judgment inventory with embedded cognitive processing questions was developed to address these issues. The data do not support the models as proposed. After significant modification, situation awareness was the only cognitive processing variable to show promise as a predictor of situational judgment scores. Likely reasons include inappropriate operationalization of the factors. This research also examines the relationship of situational judgment to performance in a group of university scholarship recipients. Situational judgment was proposed to be a partial mediator between accepted performance predictors and three performance criteria. The data do not support the model as hypothesized. After significant modification, the situational judgment scores were still not predictive of performance. Likely reasons for the lack of predictive validity include the nature of situational judgment, the nature of the sample, and methodological weaknesses. Implications for future research are discussed.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-03312003-225248en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/4841
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectpersonnel selectionen_US
dc.subjectperformanceen_US
dc.subjectcognitive processesen_US
dc.subjectsituation awarenessen_US
dc.subjectperformance appraisalen_US
dc.subjectsituational judgmenten_US
dc.titleSituational Judgment: An Investigation of Its Process and Relationship to Scholar Performanceen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
589.65 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections