Specification and Estimation of Economic Models of Asset Prices

dc.contributor.advisorAlastair Hall, Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorBarry Goodwin, Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorWally Thurman, Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDuncan Holthausen, Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Matthew C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T18:29:35Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T18:29:35Z
dc.date.issued2001-09-10en_US
dc.degree.disciplineEconomicsen_US
dc.degree.levelPhD Dissertationen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.description.abstractThe three essays of this thesis research model selection and estimation issues in financial econometrics. Special attention is given to comparing various approaches used previously in the literature and attempting to compare their out-of-sample performance. Chapter two explores the value of modelling the deterministic seasonal componentof volatility and alternate conditional distributions for the soybean futures market.The simultaneous modelling of deterministic seasonal volatility and conditional heteroscedasticity provides for much more precise predictions of observed options prices.Likewise, for the purposes of volatility forecasting, flexible conditional distribution modelling does not seem to benefit volatility forecasting.Chapter three compares the performance of continuous-time and discrete-timemodels of time-varying volatility, speci.cally stochastic volatility and GARCH processes.These models are again applied to the soybean futures markets. The resultsconclude that significant tradeoffs must be made in using continuous-time models in option price prediction. The flexibility of GARCH processes when applied to discretely-sampled data allows more accurate and precise prediction and simulationof volatility processes. Chapter four compares the performance of three alternative models for stochastic discount factor estimation. In doing so, previously overlooked weaknesses of the approaches are revealed. Contrary to previous research, this chapter finds less supportfor two-factor and nonlinear specifications. Most significantly, in out-of-sample pricing, the non-negativity restriction previously tested in Bansal and Viswanathan (1993) was found to possibly over some benefit, as economic theory would suggest,but contrary to the findings in Bansal and Viswanathan.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-20010910-161402en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/3384
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.titleSpecification and Estimation of Economic Models of Asset Pricesen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
1.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections