Evaluation of Hydrology in an Agricultural Watershed and Nitrogen Removal by Constructed Wetlands

dc.contributor.advisorStephen W. Broome, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDevendra M. Amatya, Committee Co-Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDean L. Hesterberg, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorD. Keith Cassel, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyun Wooen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T18:59:05Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T18:59:05Z
dc.date.issued2009-04-24en_US
dc.degree.disciplineSoil Scienceen_US
dc.degree.leveldissertationen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.description.abstractThere has been a particular concern on excessive nitrogen loading in coastal watersheds because agricultural lands are located adjacent to environmentally sensitive waters. The constructed wetland at a watershed outlet is recognized as an environmentally safe wastewater treatment system, but the results still vary. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of in-stream processes in agricultural watersheds of the lower coastal plain, to determine nitrogen transformations in constructed wetlands, and to propose a modeling approach for quantifying nitrogen transport and in agricultural watersheds and constructed wetlands. The first step was a literature review on nitrogen retention in agricultural streams, nitrogen transformation in constructed wetlands, and design criteria of constructed wetlands for efficient nitrogen removal. In the second step, the daily outflow from a 1037 ha agricultural watershed at Open Grounds Farm, Carteret County, NC was evaluated using the DRAINWAT model. As a third step, vegetation succession and nitrogen removal efficiency were monitored, and a sequential nitrogen model in constructed wetlands was evaluated. Mainly due to problems with flow meters and lack of sufficient measured data, hydrology simulation results were not adequate to estimate nitrogen loading. For this reason, Hydrologic modeling for watershed focused on the sensitivity analysis using four input parameters: Manning’s roughness coefficient, maximum depressional storage, calculation methods of potential evapotranspiration (PET), and channel bedslope. PET calculation methods were most sensitive among those four parameters. Two Thornthwaite based methods using different correction factors (Thorn 1 and Thorn 2) were tested. Thorn 2 correction factors obtained from the agricultural watershed were more accurate than Thorn 1 correction factors, which were averaged from two agricultural and one forested watershed. Three hydrophyte species were successfully established in the constructed wetland. Good removal efficiencies of constructed wetland system for all nitrogen species were observed. Simulation results of sequential nitrogen model were not yet reasonable due to the limited number of sample data, a long waterway before the first cell of the constructed wetland, and non-calibrated average rate constant of the model. This model may predict the concentration of nitrogen species successfully with proper calibration with more measured data.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-03122009-094615en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/4687
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectConstructed wetlandsen_US
dc.subjectDRAINMODen_US
dc.subjectDRAINWATen_US
dc.subjectAgricultural watersheden_US
dc.subjectHydrologic modelingen_US
dc.subjectNitrogen removalen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Hydrology in an Agricultural Watershed and Nitrogen Removal by Constructed Wetlandsen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
1.96 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections