Investigating the Quality of the School Technology Needs Assessment (STNA) 3.0: A Validity and Reliability Study

dc.contributor.advisorJason Allaire, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorEllen Vasu, Committee Co-Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorKevin Oliver, Committee Co-Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorJohn Nietfeld, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorCorn, Jenifer O'Sullivanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T19:05:51Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T19:05:51Z
dc.date.issued2008-04-25en_US
dc.degree.disciplineCurriculum and Instructionen_US
dc.degree.leveldissertationen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.description.abstractSchools and districts should use a well-designed needs assessment to inform important decisions about a range of technology program areas. Presently, there is a lack of valid and reliable instruments available to schools to effectively assess their educational needs to better design and evaluate their projects and initiatives. The School Technology Needs Assessment (STNA) is a free, user-friendly online survey tool that meets this need for planning and formative evaluation of technology projects in educational settings. This study used existing data from a robust sample (n=1918) of educators from across North Carolina to examine the reliability and validity of STNA. A collective review of study results including the literature review, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and internal consistently reliability analysis indicate that STNA is a high quality instrument. The literature supports the selection and inclusion of STNAs subconstructs. Items in STNA cluster together into 10 factors that support the reliability of the existing constructs identified in STNA. Factors focusing on technology program objectives (Teacher Technology Use, Student Technology Use, Teacher Impact, and Student Impact) were identified as stable, reliable, and invariant across multiple school-level response groups. Additionally, the pattern of responses across school-level groups was the same for 30 out of 49 STNA items related to technology program strategies. A copy of the survey is included in the appendix (see Appendix A) and is available online at http://srvlive.serve.org⁄Evaluation⁄Capacity⁄EvalFramework•resources⁄STNA.php.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-03042008-114121en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/4996
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectfactor analysisen_US
dc.subjectinstrument developmenten_US
dc.subjecttechnologyen_US
dc.subjectschoolen_US
dc.subjectformative evaluationen_US
dc.titleInvestigating the Quality of the School Technology Needs Assessment (STNA) 3.0: A Validity and Reliability Studyen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
530.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections