Quantifying the Benefits of Improved Rolling of Chip Seals.

dc.contributor.advisorRoy H. Borden, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorRichard L. Lemaster, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorY. Richard Kim, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorAkhtarhusein A. Tayebali, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jaejunen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T18:43:00Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T18:43:00Z
dc.date.issued2009-04-23en_US
dc.degree.disciplineCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.degree.leveldissertationen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation presents an improvement in the rolling protocol for chip seals based on an evaluation of aggregate retention performance and aggregate embedment depth. The flip-over test (FOT), Vialit test, modified sand circle test, digital image processing technique, and the third-scale Model Mobile Loading Simulator (MMLS3) are employed to evaluate the effects of the various rolling parameters and to measure chip seal performance. The samples used to evaluate the chip seal rolling protocol were obtained directly from field construction. In order to determine the optimal rolling protocol, the effects of roller type, number of coverages, coverage distribution on the sublayers of a multiple chip seal (i.e., the split seal and triple seal), and rolling pattern are evaluated using the results of aggregate retention performance tests, the modified sand circle method, and the digital image process. It is found that two types of roller, the pneumatic tire roller and the combination roller, are recommended as the optimal rollers for the chip seal. In addition, it is found that the optimal number of coverages for the chip seal, as determined from measurements of the aggregate, is three coverages. Moreover, the performance of the triple seal without coverage at the bottom layer does not affect the aggregate retention performance, although the split seal does require coverage at the bottom layer. Finally, it is found that the rolling pattern is strongly related to a delayed rolling time between the aggregate spreader and the initial rolling time. Therefore, it was recommended that two pneumatic tire rollers applied initial one coverage with optimal delayed rolling time (between 2 min. and 4 min.) to entire lane width, and then the combination roller applied two additional coverages. Further, it is confirmed that the delayed rolling time is related to the aggregate moisture condition and the ambient temperature.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-04212008-125638en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/4032
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectRoller typesen_US
dc.subjectRoller coveragesen_US
dc.subjectRoller patternsen_US
dc.subjectChip sealen_US
dc.subjectMMLS3en_US
dc.titleQuantifying the Benefits of Improved Rolling of Chip Seals.en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
2.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections