Genetic and Cultural Effects on Stem Taper and Bark Thickness in Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.)

dc.contributor.advisorDr. Robert C. Purnell, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Marcia L. Gumpertz, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Steven E. McKeand, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Bronson P. Bullock, Committee Co-Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Timothy J. Mullin, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.authorSherrill, Joshuaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T17:57:20Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T17:57:20Z
dc.date.issued2005-07-13en_US
dc.degree.disciplineForestryen_US
dc.degree.levelthesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSen_US
dc.description.abstractTotal inside-bark volume is the most important selection criterion for productivity in tree breeding programs in the Southeastern U.S. Tree breeding programs typically estimate total inside-bark volume based on diameter at breast height (D) and total height (H) without accounting for stem taper or bark thickness. A genotype by cultural treatment study with weed control and fertilization treatments was measured in the 13th growing season. Twenty-five open-pollinated first- and second-generation loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) families were destructively sampled to measure diameters and bark thickness along the stem and to make a direct determination of total inside- and outside-bark volume. Selection for volume using a combined-variable (D*D*H) equation was found to be highly effective for making volume gains; although, overall estimates of total inside-bark volume using a combined-variable equation from Warner and Goebel (1963) were less accurate than those from destructive sampling. Precision could be improved by adding further terms to the prediction model, such as bark thickness and form quotients; however, these additional measurements could not explain all of the imprecision. Genetic components for both stem taper and bark thickness were estimated. These two factors had a small effect on volume estimates due to the high correlation between estimated and measured total inside-bark volumes. There was a positive genetic correlation between bark thickness and D that indicates that selection for larger D will produce individuals with thicker bark and may eventually affect total inside-bark volume estimates.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-03222005-151742en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/635
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectmixed modelen_US
dc.subjectprogeny testen_US
dc.subjectheight-diameter relationshipen_US
dc.subjectbiometricen_US
dc.subjectcrown ratioen_US
dc.subjecttree improvementen_US
dc.subjectgeneticen_US
dc.subjectvolumeen_US
dc.subjectheight-DBH relationshipen_US
dc.subjectform quotienten_US
dc.subjectgenotype by environmenten_US
dc.subjectGxEen_US
dc.subjectpinus taedaen_US
dc.subjectloblolly pineen_US
dc.subjectbark thicknessen_US
dc.subjectstem taperen_US
dc.titleGenetic and Cultural Effects on Stem Taper and Bark Thickness in Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda L.)en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
1.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections