Water Quality Assessment of a Degraded Stream Prior to Restoration and Nitrate Reduction through Controlled Drainage

dc.contributor.advisorRobert O. Evans, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDeanna L. Osmond, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorGregory D. Jennings, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchaetzle, Heather Lynnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T17:53:18Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T17:53:18Z
dc.date.issued2005-07-28en_US
dc.degree.disciplineBiological and Agricultural Engineeringen_US
dc.degree.levelthesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSen_US
dc.description.abstractBest management practices are often necessary to minimize non point source water quality problems. The Core Creek Project implemented and evaluated best management practices (BMPs) throughout the upper watershed to reduce nutrient loading to the Neuse River. A portion of the Core Creek Project, involving the evaluation and restoration of a degraded, channelized, pasture stream, was initiated in 2003. Beef cattle (Bos taurus) had unrestricted access to the waterway, severely degrading the stream bank and streambed. In preparation for stream restoration, the existing water quality was monitored and assessed. Near the end of the background evaluation study, the beef cattle were removed from the pasture. The nitrogen concentrations downstream of the pasture were generally lower than those upstream, but these differences were not significantly different. The downstream phosphorus concentration was generally higher than the upstream concentration. This difference was significant for orthophosphate. Fecal coliform levels were significantly higher downstream than upstream, before cattle exclusion. After exclusion, there was a statistically significant reduction in fecal levels downstream, dropping an average of 83%. The average daily and maximum daily water temperatures at the downstream sampling location were significantly higher by an average of 2.5o C than the upstream temperatures. Macroinvertebrate sampling indicated that the quality of the stream was severely stressed, both during 2003 and 2004. A monthly grab sampling scheme predicted a significantly different nutrient load than continuous weekly composite sampling. Total Kjeldahl nitrogen, ammonium, total phosphorus, orthophosphate and total suspended solids were 47%, 95%, 49%, 62%, and 54% lower, respectively, using the monthly sampling protocol. Nitrate was 51% higher when using the monthly sampling scheme. An additional component of the Core Creek Project evaluated the reduction of NO3-N leaving the Core Creek watershed due to the implementation of controlled drainage and nitrogen management plans. DRAINMOD-N was calibrated and extrapolated on a field by field basis to predict long-term hydrology and nitrate losses based on BMPs implemented and crops grown throughout the watershed. Predicted nitrate-nitrogen reduction was most effectively accomplished when controlled drainage and a nitrogen management plan were used in conjunction with one another. If implemented separately, a nitrogen management plan was predicted to be more effective than controlled drainage alone. The cropping system also impacted the drainage rate and nitrate loss from the fields. Potentially, a 30% and 75% nitrate reduction can be achieved growing cotton or soybeans, respectively, as compared to corn. Controlled drainage reduced the drainage outflow by 6.8 centimeters (21.3%), annually, compared to conventional drainage. This flow reduction accounted for 11.5% of the NO3-N reduction leaving the watershed.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-11132004-175215en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/117
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectcattle exclusionen_US
dc.subjectwater chemistryen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled drainageen_US
dc.subjectnutrient managementen_US
dc.subjectDRAINMOD-Nen_US
dc.titleWater Quality Assessment of a Degraded Stream Prior to Restoration and Nitrate Reduction through Controlled Drainageen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
2.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections