Dispositional Influences and Individual Differences in Work Performance: Relationships of Goal Orientation, Growth Need Strength, and Conscientiousness.

dc.contributor.advisorBob Pond, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorPaul Mulvey, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorMark A. Wilson, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorBill Cunningham, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorDierdorff, Erich Clintonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T19:08:56Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T19:08:56Z
dc.date.issued2003-06-25en_US
dc.degree.disciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.degree.leveldissertationen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate the roles of dispositional variables in affecting work performance. Study participants were criminal investigators from a state bureau of investigation (N = 158). The predictive potentials of growth need strength (GNS), learning orientation, performance orientation, and Conscientiousness were examined using structural equation modeling in relation to multidimensional work performance. All scales used for the study's constructs were subjected to a tetrad analysis prior to modeling in order to ensure unidimensional congeneric indicator sets. Three job performance constructs were incorporated: task performance as rating data, task performance as work activity data, and citizenship performance as rating data. GNS was shown to predict work activity task performance. Conscientiousness was found to predict citizenship performance. Learning orientation predicted both work activity task performance and citizenship performance, however the directions of the relationships were negative. Performance orientation was not found to predict any performance construct. None of the dispositional constructs predicted task performance as derived from ratings. Of the predictors, GNS and learning orientation displayed the highest latent correlation due to their similar conceptualizations. Using different operationalizations and sources for the latent performance criteria increased their measurement distinctiveness, as well as revealing differential predictive validities. The implications of these predictive validities and the importance of using a multidimensional approach to performance in future research are discussed.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-05292002-203253en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/5166
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectcontextual performanceen_US
dc.subjectstructural equation modelingen_US
dc.subjecttetrad analysisen_US
dc.subjectcitizenshipen_US
dc.subjecttask performanceen_US
dc.subjectdispositionsen_US
dc.subjectwork performanceen_US
dc.subjectjob performanceen_US
dc.titleDispositional Influences and Individual Differences in Work Performance: Relationships of Goal Orientation, Growth Need Strength, and Conscientiousness.en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
608.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections