A Radioactive Waste Cleanup Decision Making Framework

dc.contributor.advisorMan-Sung Yim, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorPeter Bloomfield, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDavid McNelis, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorOttinger, Keith Everetteen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T18:03:05Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T18:03:05Z
dc.date.issued2009-04-24en_US
dc.degree.disciplineNuclear Engineeringen_US
dc.degree.levelthesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSen_US
dc.descriptionNorth Carolina State University Theses Nuclear Engineering.
dc.description.abstractMany sites in the United States and around the world are contaminated with radioactive waste. Because of the public perception of radiation, making economically feasible and socially acceptable radioactive waste cleanup decisions is often difficult. The current solution to this problem is to have the public participate in the decision making process. This allows for more disclosure to and input from the stakeholders which are supposed to make the decision more socially acceptable. The results of this approach have not always been good and meaningful public involvement takes time and resources. In this work a decision making framework is developed, which attempts to solve this problem by creating a method for quantifying the value of the public’s perception of the contamination and cleanup options. These values are then input into a multi attribute value theory analysis which includes the direct costs of the cleanup and dose, and attempts to find socially viable solutions for the decision. The framework is complete, however, more research is need for to be able to adequately quantify the public’s perception. A case study based on the contamination at the Radioactive Waste Disposal Site (RWDS) of the Kurchatov Institute (KI) in Moscow, Russia was performed to illustrate how the framework works. This case study was primarily based on published data of the contamination levels and other important parameters as of 2003. However, some of the required data was not available or very uncertain and the site has since undergone remediation so the results may not represent the actual KI RWDS. In this case study the optimum cleanup method was determined to be covering the site with clean fill for discount rates of 5 percent or less and no action for higher discount rates. This result seems reasonable but more research is needed to determine if it fully represents the public’s perception of the contamination or the cleanup alternatives and if not how to improve the model.en_US
dc.formatThesis (M.S.)--North Carolina State University.
dc.identifier.otheretd-03272009-154644en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/1308
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectDecision Makingen_US
dc.subjectRadioactive Wasteen_US
dc.titleA Radioactive Waste Cleanup Decision Making Frameworken_US
dcterms.abstractKeywords: decision making, radioactive waste.
dcterms.extentxii, 118 pages : illustrations (some color), maps (some color)

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
2.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections