Measuring Conservation Success: An Investigation of Land Trusts in North Carolina

dc.contributor.advisorPeter White, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorNick Haddad, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorGeorge Hess, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, Louise Boatwrighten_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-19T18:19:35Z
dc.date.available2010-08-19T18:19:35Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-02en_US
dc.degree.disciplineNatural Resourcesen_US
dc.degree.levelthesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSen_US
dc.description.abstractLocal land trusts in North Carolina protect land to conserve natural resources and biodiversity, and to provide public benefits, such as clean air and water. However the success of their efforts is commonly reported in terms of the amount of land protected or money raised in support of conservation rather than in measures that describe whether or not conservations goals have been achieved. In order to determine if the conservation lands protected by local land trusts are meeting the goals they were intended to serve, I reviewed published research, literature and methodologies to identify common practices used to measure conservation success. Findings indicate three fundamental processes that allow organizations to evaluate the effectiveness of their interventions which are; 1) conducting status assessments that include articulating specific goals and describing the project context; 2) identifying threats to conservation targets; and 3) identifying, developing, and monitoring specific indicators whose status is a measurable reflection of the conservation targets and interventions. I also surveyed 24 land trusts in North Carolina to determine why they protect lands, what activities they perform that would allow them to evaluate the conservation impact of their work, and how success is reported to the public. From the survey, I conclude that land trusts in North Carolina are unable to determine if the lands they have protected are meeting their conservation goals because they are not consistently setting measurable goals, indentifying specific conservation targets, or monitoring indicators that would reflect conservation impact, processes identified in the literature review as necessary to evaluate conservation projects. I identify the Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation framework as an applicable tool for local land trusts to use to focus their conservation efforts and develop measurable goals and report their conservation success.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-01052010-134542en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/6318
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectconservation successen_US
dc.subjectland trustsen_US
dc.subjectassessmenten_US
dc.subjectmonitoringen_US
dc.subjectevaluationen_US
dc.titleMeasuring Conservation Success: An Investigation of Land Trusts in North Carolinaen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
684.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections