Modeling Regional Evapotranspiration for Forested Watersheds across the Southern United States

dc.contributor.advisorGe Sun, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.authorLu, Jianbiaoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T17:57:51Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T17:57:51Z
dc.date.issued2002-06-20en_US
dc.degree.disciplineForestryen_US
dc.degree.levelthesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSen_US
dc.descriptionNorth Carolina State University Theses Forestry.
dc.description.abstractEvapotranspiration (ET) is the process that returns water to the atmosphere and therefore completes the hydrologic cycle. ET is a major component in the hydrological balance, and therefore is important to understanding forest water yield, sediment and nutrient movement. However, direct measurement of forest ET for a large region is not possible. The objectives of this study were to develop a model to estimate long-term annual actual evapotranspiration (AET) for forested watersheds across the southern United States (U.S.) and to compare the differences among six potential evapotranspiration (PET) methods. The developed AET model will be used to study hydrologic effects of climate and landuse changes. The six compared PET methods include three temperature-based methods (the Thornthwaite, Hamon and Hargreaves-Samani method) and three radiation-based methods (the Turc, Makkink and Priestley-Taylor method). A GIS database including land cover, hydrology and climate was developed for thirty-nine forested watersheds across the southern U.S.. Based on these data, a long-term annual AET model was developed. The independent variables included in the model are rainfall, latitude, elevation and percentage of land cover of conifer forests and water body in the watersheds. The model has a R2 of 0.85 and is sufficient to predict long-term annual AET for forested watersheds across the southern U.S.. Six PET methods were highly correlated but significantly different from each other. Greater differences were found among the temperature-based PET methods than radiation-based PET methods. In comparisons of the six PET methods, the Priestley-Taylor, Hamon and Turc methods performed better than the Thornthwaite, Makkink and Hargreaves-Samani methods.en_US
dc.formatThesis (M.S.)--North Carolina State University.
dc.identifier.otheretd-06202002-150338en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/710
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectPETen_US
dc.subjectmodelingen_US
dc.subjectforest hydrologyen_US
dc.subjectpotential evapotranspirationen_US
dc.subjectregional evapotranspirationen_US
dc.subjectETen_US
dc.subjectevapotranspirationen_US
dc.titleModeling Regional Evapotranspiration for Forested Watersheds across the Southern United Statesen_US
dcterms.abstractKeywords: PET, modeling, forest hydrology, potential evapotranspiration, regional evapotranspiration, ET, evapotranspiration.
dcterms.extentviii, 105 pages : color illustrations, color maps

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
4.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections