Noise Ratio As a Non-Nested Model Selection Tool.

dc.contributor.advisorAtsushi Inoue, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDenis Pelletier, Committee Co-Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorNegash G. Medhin, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDouglas K. Pearce, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorKurmanj, Agiren_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T19:11:24Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T19:11:24Z
dc.date.issued2009-04-27en_US
dc.degree.disciplineEconomicsen_US
dc.degree.leveldissertationen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this dissertation, we analyze whether the noise ratio statistic of Durlauf and Hall (1989), NRT, can be used as a non-nested model selection tool in a similar fashion to the Rivers and Vuong (2002) framework. For this purpose, we first show that, when scaled by the sample size T, NRT is distributed as a mixture of chi-square random variables, under a null hypothesis of correct specification. Further, we study the asymptotic distribution of functionals of this statistic for model selection purposes, under different assumptions about: i)model specification and ii) the data generating processes of two non-nested RE models, whose parameter vector is estimated either by GMM, in Chapter 1, or by the continuous updating estimator in Chapter 2. In Chapter 3, we use Monte-Carlo simulations to compute the empirical size and empirical power of tests with statistics whose limiting distributions were studied in Chapters 1 and 2 of this dissertation. First, we use a simulation routine and compute the rejection frequency of the tests developed using these statistics, which represents empirical size under a null hypothesis and power under an alternative. Under our null hypothesis, both models are equally good from a goodness of fit perspective. Under the first alternative, the first model is better and under the second alternative hypothesis, the second model is better from a goodness of fit perspective, that. Under all scenarios covered in the first chapter, we use the limit of the noise ratio statistic evaluated at the probability limit of the GMM estimator as our goodness of fit measure. Finally, in Chapter 4, we use the model selection methodology used in Chapter 1 for comparing different formulations of the pure production smoothing model of inventories. The particular models compared are the production smoothing model of inventories and a variant of it covered in Durlauf and Maccini (1995). All statistics used for model comparison are evaluated at the GMM estimator for the corresponding model i = 1; 2.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-01062009-144822en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/5308
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectnon-nesteden_US
dc.subjectmodel selectionen_US
dc.subjectCUEen_US
dc.subjectGMMen_US
dc.subjectnoise ratioen_US
dc.titleNoise Ratio As a Non-Nested Model Selection Tool.en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
775.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections