Selecting the Correct Solution to a Physics Problem When Given Several Possibilities

dc.contributor.advisorDr. John Risley, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Robert Beichner, Committee Co-Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Ruth Chabay, Committee Co-Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Bruce Sherwood, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Evanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-19T18:13:55Z
dc.date.available2010-08-19T18:13:55Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-20en_US
dc.degree.disciplinePhysicsen_US
dc.degree.leveldissertationen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.description.abstractDecades of research have identified what actions students take when studying written passages or worked examples. Such research has provided a rather profound understanding of which actions are beneficial for learning. Unfortunately, the research has not fully explored how to encourage the use of the beneficial learning actions within the realm of physics. From my own pilot work, examples encompassing less complex material tend to have a questionable impact. Yet when the material is expanded to more complex situations, some participants tended to become overwhelmed or provide other evidence of shallow processing. However, given the ascension of promising reforms that integrate incorrect solutions, perhaps the inclusion of incorrect solutions might cue the elusive beneficial learning actions. While the research does provide assessments of such reforms, there are limited results on what mental processing emerges. This paper reports a study that is directed toward the above issues. Participants were given four physics problems. The participants were also given three possible solutions for each problem. Only one of the solutions was correct, while the other two contained errors. The participants were asked to identify the correct solution and the errors in the other solutions. The central research question is: what actions emerge when performing this task of selecting the correct solution and finding the errors in the other solutions? Overall, the actions associated with the above task are reassuringly consistent with the worked example literature and the reading comprehension literature. The analysis also suggests two results regarding participant attention. Participant judgments tended to include physics-related aspects of the solution that were different across given solutions, and for the sample as a whole, some degree of processing was found for all information representations used in this study (prose, pictorial, and mathematical).en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-03052010-234223en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/6152
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectPhysics Problemsen_US
dc.subjectPhysics Worked Examplesen_US
dc.titleSelecting the Correct Solution to a Physics Problem When Given Several Possibilitiesen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
4.61 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections