The Association of Weed Species Richness and Abundance with Field Margin Type in Crop Fields

dc.contributor.advisorCavell Brownie, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorMichael G. Burton, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorNancy G. Creamer, Committee Co-Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorJ. Paul Mueller, Committee Co-Chairen_US
dc.contributor.authorJelinek, Susan Ten_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T18:03:50Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T18:03:50Z
dc.date.issued2004-05-13en_US
dc.degree.disciplineCrop Scienceen_US
dc.degree.levelthesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSen_US
dc.description.abstractNatural vegetation on farms such as field margins, successional fallow fields, ditch systems, and neighboring forests provide increased biodiversity, structural diversity, habitat for wildlife and beneficial insects, and can act as protective buffers against agrochemical drift. Nevertheless, farmers frequently view these areas as potential sources of weeds, insect pests, and diseases. Objectives of this study were to examine weed species richness and abundance in cropland bordered by managed versus unmanaged field margins to determine if differences in weed infestation exist. Weed abundance and richness were measured in crop fields along permanent transects that extended from the field edge to the center of the crop fields. Presence/absence data for all plant species in the field margin were also recorded. Transect data from fields with margins of natural vegetation were compared to transect data from fields with managed margins using analysis of variance. There were no differences between log total abundance of weeds in crop edges adjacent to managed and unmanaged field margins (P=0.44). For both margin types, more weeds were found near the field edge than in the center of the field (1.37±0.08 to 0.52±0.07 and 1.39±0.07 to 0.41±0.06, for managed and unmanaged field margins respectively). Species richness was slightly higher along crop edges of managed field margins (7.35±0.32) than crop edges along unmanaged field margins (6.55±0.31). Across all sampling dates, a total of 105 plant species were identified in the field margins. Of these species, 42 (40% of all species) were found somewhere in a field when all sampling dates were pooled. Managed field margins had lower species richness than unmanaged field margins - less than half the mean number of species (5.8±0.28 versus 14.7±0.62 species, respectively). No association was found between plant species occurring in the field margin and in the crop field by generating 2 x 2 contingency tables via PROC FREQ and testing the association with Fisher's exact two-sided test. Using logistic regression via PROC GENMOD, margin type and weed presence in the field margin were not effective predictors of weed occurrence in the crop field. KEYWORDS: field margin, weed populations, crop edges, farm natural areasen_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-05132004-134323en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/1419
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectcrop edgesen_US
dc.subjectfarm natural areasen_US
dc.subjectfield marginen_US
dc.subjectweed populationsen_US
dc.titleThe Association of Weed Species Richness and Abundance with Field Margin Type in Crop Fieldsen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
3.14 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections