Teaching Science in Museums

dc.contributor.advisorDave Eggleston, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorEileen Parsons, Committee Co-Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorGlenda Carter, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorJohn Penick, Committee Co-Chairen_US
dc.contributor.authorTran, Lynn Uyenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T18:29:57Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T18:29:57Z
dc.date.issued2004-11-30en_US
dc.degree.disciplineScience Educationen_US
dc.degree.leveldissertationen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.description.abstractSchools in America have used museums as resources to supplement their curriculum since the 19th century. Field trip research is predominantly from the teachers' and students' perspectives, and draws attention to teachers' and students' contributions prior to, during, and after their field trips. Meanwhile, museum educators' contributions to field trip experiences have been scantily addressed. These educators develop and implement programs intended to help students explore and make sense of their experiences, and despite their limited time with students, studies show they can be memorable. First, field trips are a break in the usual routine, and thus educators leading programs have curiosity and attention attracting power. Second, classroom science teaching literature suggests teachers' teaching knowledge and goals can affect their behaviors, and in turn influence student learning. Third, classroom teachers are novices at planning and implementing field trip planners consequently museum educators can share this responsibility. The follwing research questions guided this participant observation study intended to examine one aspect of the teaching culture in museums, i.e. instruction during one-time science lessons. (1) How do educators teaching one-time lessons in museums adapt their instruction to the students they teach? (2) How do time limitations affect instruction? (3) How does perceived variability in entering student knowledge affect instruction? Data included observations, interviews, and researcher field notes. An inductive analysis model was adopted to analyze the data. Five major findings emerged from this analysis. (1) Repeating lessons develop comfort and insight to compensate one-time nature of lessons. (2) Details within science lessons can vary according to the students. (3) A lifelong learning perspective forms the foundation for educators' choices. (4) Refine teaching to use time efficiently. (5) Educators designate roles to teachers and chaperones to maximize time. These findings had implications for museum educators, classroom teachers, and all those involved in school field trips. Recommendations for action and future research emerging from this study were listed and discussed.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-11022004-162202en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/3423
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectinformal settingen_US
dc.subjectinformal scienceen_US
dc.subjectteachingen_US
dc.subjectmuseumen_US
dc.titleTeaching Science in Museumsen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
674.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections