Software Analysis Techniques For Odor Analysis and Classification Using the Electronic Nose
dc.contributor.advisor | Dr. Peter L. Mente, Committee Member | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Dr. S. Andrew Hale, Committee Co-Chair | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Dr. Susan M. Blanchard, Committee Co-Chair | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gayo, Javier | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-02T17:56:22Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-04-02T17:56:22Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002-08-19 | en_US |
dc.degree.discipline | Biological and Agricultural Engineering | en_US |
dc.degree.level | thesis | en_US |
dc.degree.name | MS | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The objectives of this thesis were to compare methods of feature extraction and data classification used in electronic nose. The NC State electronic nose (e-nose) was used to discriminate between SkipJack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) samples cooked at three temperatures: raw, heated to 55°C, and heated to 85°C. The thirty-six samples were analyzed by the e-nose on three separate days. The data were combined into one large set and randomly divided into a training (60%) and a testing (40%) set. The samples were labeled according to cooking treatment. Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were used for feature extraction. Extracted features from the training and testing sets were used to achieve a classification percentage using Least Squares (LS) and K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN). Data from a bell integral were used to train a feed-forward Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with a backpropagation algorithm. LDA proved to be a better method of feature extraction than PCA. ANN performance was not statistically different from LS, and performed better than KNN, with PCA as feature extraction. Both KNN and LS using LDA as feature extraction outperformed the ANN and the same methods using PCA. | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | etd-05212002-102142 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/518 | |
dc.rights | I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. | en_US |
dc.subject | ODOR ANALYSIS | en_US |
dc.subject | ELECTRONIC NOSE | en_US |
dc.subject | CLASSIFICATION | en_US |
dc.subject | TECHNIQUES | en_US |
dc.subject | SOFTWARE ANALYSIS | en_US |
dc.title | Software Analysis Techniques For Odor Analysis and Classification Using the Electronic Nose | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1