Morphological and Genetic Description of the Freshwater Mussel, Elliptio complanata (Lightfoot, 1786) in the Cape Fear River System, N.C.

dc.contributor.advisorJay F. Levine, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorBruce Weir, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorFred Gould, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorWondwossen Gebreyes, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorArthur Bogan, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorMolina, Reverie Alvarezen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T19:12:54Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T19:12:54Z
dc.date.issued2004-05-21en_US
dc.degree.disciplineComparative Biomedical Sciencesen_US
dc.degree.leveldissertationen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research is to provide a preliminary description of the morphological and genetic variation of a cosmopolitan freshwater mussel E. complanata from one North Carolina river system, Cape Fear River (CFR). Individuals from CFR were collected and compared with known specimens of E. complanata (topotype). Multivariate analyses, such as factor and discriminant analyses were utilized to differentiate the individuals based on thirty morphological shell landmarks. Genetic analyses involved the use of diversity estimates and cluster analyses based on cytochrome oxidase I (COI) sequence and Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) fingerprint data. Factor analysis suggest that E. complanata from CFR maybe differentiated based on the thickness of posterior and anterior shell angles, and obesity of the shells. Significant differences between the CFR samples and topotypes were demonstrated by discriminant analysis of morphological data and by COI gene diversity estimates. This difference corroborated earlier work suggesting geographic delineation of E. complanata shell form. Genomic fingerprinting suggests further variation even within the topotypes. Phenotype of the topotypic materials seems to support this genomic variability. Heirarchical cluster analyses of morphometry and genetic data further showed different groups supporting earlier research suggesting high form variation within the E. complanata species.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-05202004-184213en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/5384
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectAFLPen_US
dc.subjectCOI sequencingen_US
dc.subjectmorphometryen_US
dc.subjectgenetic variationen_US
dc.subjectfreshwater musselen_US
dc.subjectElliptio complanataen_US
dc.titleMorphological and Genetic Description of the Freshwater Mussel, Elliptio complanata (Lightfoot, 1786) in the Cape Fear River System, N.C.en_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
1.57 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections