Residence Time Distribution of Multiple Particles in Four Configurations of Holding Tubes

dc.contributor.advisorAndrey Kuznetsov, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorSaad Khan, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorK.P. Sandeep, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorJosip Simunovic, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorTanyel, Zeynepen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T18:09:46Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T18:09:46Z
dc.date.issued2004-11-15en_US
dc.degree.disciplineFood Scienceen_US
dc.degree.levelthesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSen_US
dc.description.abstractResidence time distributions of multiple particles (as affected by process and system parameters) were investigated during non-Newtonian tube flow. Process parameters included flow rate, particle type, carrier fluid viscosity, and particle concentration. The system parameter of interest was the holding tube configuration. Polystyrene and acrylic particles were used as model food particles. Digital imaging analysis was used to obtain residence time data of particles. A novel type of holding tube (chaotic holding tube) was constructed. Comparisons among the straight, single helical, double helical, and chaotic holding tube were performed in terms residence time distribution (RTD) of particles. In addition, the effect of inclination angle (0 ° and 45 °) of the chaotic holding tube was investigated. It was found that the narrowest RTD of particles was obtained in the single helical holding tube. RTstd in the chaotic holding tube was greater than that in the single helical holding tube, but lower than those in the straight and double helical holding tubes. The most significant process parameter affecting RTD was flow rate. The effect of flow rate was more pronounced for high density (acrylic) particles. Carrier fluid viscosity, particle type, and particle concentration did not have significant effects on the overall RTstd. Trends observed in the chaotic holding tube were similar to those observed in the single helical holding tube. However, there were some cases where use of chaotic holding tube resulted in narrower RTD of particles. Changing the inclination angle from 0 ° to 45 ° in the chaotic holding tube resulted in wider RTD of both types of particles.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-08102004-124311en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/2038
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectresidence time distributionen_US
dc.subjectmultiphase flowen_US
dc.subjectholding tubeen_US
dc.titleResidence Time Distribution of Multiple Particles in Four Configurations of Holding Tubesen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
462.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections