Development and Demonstration of a Methodology for Characterizing and Managing Uncertainty and Variability in Emission Inventories

dc.contributor.advisorH. Christopher Frey, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorE. Downey Brill, Jr., Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDonald Van der Vaart, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDaniel H. Loughlin, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Songen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T18:26:16Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T18:26:16Z
dc.date.issued2003-08-15en_US
dc.degree.disciplineCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.degree.leveldissertationen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.description.abstractEmission factors and emission inventories are subject to both variability and uncertainty. Variability refers to observed differences attributable to true heterogeneity or diversity in emissions. Uncertainty refers to lack of knowledge regarding the true value of emissions. Variability in emissions can be attributed to variations over time, space or across different populations. Uncertainty in emissions typically arises due to limited sample size, lack of accuracy, non-representativeness of data, measurement errors, use of surrogate data, and human errors. This work successfully demonstrated new applications of quantitative methods for characterizing variability and uncertainty in emission estimates. The methods were demonstrated with respect to cases studies on nitrogen oxides (NO[subscript x]) and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from natural gas-fueled internal combustion engines, and VOC emissions from consumer/commercial product use, gasoline terminal loading, cutback asphalt paving, architectural coatings and wood furniture coatings. Emission data must be nonnegative, typically are positively skewed and have limited sample size. The restrictive assumption of normality used in analytical methods can lead to biased uncertainty estimates. Therefore, in this work, variability was characterized by fitting parametric distributions and uncertainty due to random sampling errors was quantified based upon numerical bootstrap simulation. Uncertainty in mean emission factors was found as much as minus 90 percent to plus 180 percent in a relative basis. Key methodological issues, including separation of intra- and inter-facility/engine variability, and methods for fitting parametric distributions to unequally weighted data, were addressed. Recommendations include extending these efforts to more emission source categories and for EPA and others to routinely report well-documented emission data to facilitate uncertainty analysis.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-08142002-230644en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/3050
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectemission inventoryen_US
dc.subjectvariabilityen_US
dc.subjectuncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectemission factoren_US
dc.titleDevelopment and Demonstration of a Methodology for Characterizing and Managing Uncertainty and Variability in Emission Inventoriesen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
1.59 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections