Estimating Fuel Use and Emission Rates of Nonroad Diesel Construction Equipment Performing Representative Duty Cycles

dc.contributor.advisorWilliam Rasdorf, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Michael Philen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T19:06:04Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T19:06:04Z
dc.date.issued2009-03-18en_US
dc.degree.disciplineCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.degree.leveldissertationen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT LEWIS, MICHAEL PHIL. Estimating Fuel Use and Emission Rates of Nonroad Diesel Construction Equipment Performing Representative Duty Cycles. (Under the direction of William Rasdorf.) This dissertation presents a methodology for estimating weighted-average fuel use rates and emission rates NOx, HC, CO, and PM of construction equipment performing representative duty cycles. This work is based on field data that was collected from 34 items of construction equipment. An engine modal analysis was performed to determine the variation of fuel use and emission rates with respect to 10 individual engine modes that represented increasing engine loads. Multiple linear regression models were used to estimate the fuel use rate of engine modes 2 - 10. An acceptable regression model for fuel use was not found for engine mode 1, which corresponded to idling, so an average fuel use rate was used to estimate the idling fuel use rate. Efforts to develop linear regression models for modal emission rates proved ineffective due to low R2 values and unacceptable p-values for variable coefficients, thus, average modal emission rates of each pollutant based on the field data were used. The modal fuel use rates were weighted by the fraction of time spent in each engine mode to estimate a weighted-average mass per time fuel use rate for the representative duty cycle. The modal emission rates for each pollutant were weighted by the fraction of fuel used in each engine mode to estimate a weighted-average mass per fuel used emission rate for the representative duty cycle. The weighted-average emission rate for each pollutant was multiplied by the weighted-average fuel use rate to determine the mass per time emission rate for the duty cycle. Based on response plots of the actual versus estimated values, the methodology reliably estimated fuel use rates and emission rates of NOx, CO, and PM.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-03122009-183711en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/5008
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dis sertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectfuel use ratesen_US
dc.subjectconstruction equipmenten_US
dc.subjectduty cyclesen_US
dc.subjectair pollutantsen_US
dc.subjectemission ratesen_US
dc.titleEstimating Fuel Use and Emission Rates of Nonroad Diesel Construction Equipment Performing Representative Duty Cyclesen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
910.09 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections