Implementation Fidelity and Facilitator Concerns in the Process of Disseminating a Deliberate Psychological and Professional Education Innovation
| dc.contributor.advisor | Dr. John Nietfeld, Committee Co-Chair | en_US |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Dr. Alan Reiman, Committee Co-Chair | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Dotger, Benjamin Haywood | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-04-02T18:49:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-04-02T18:49:24Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007-05-03 | en_US |
| dc.degree.discipline | Curriculum and Instruction | en_US |
| dc.degree.level | dissertation | en_US |
| dc.degree.name | PhD | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This study examines the dissemination of a deliberate psychological and professional education (DPPE) innovation from its development in a university setting to induction within a rural public school system. The DPPE curriculum innovation was designed to foster cognitive and pedagogical development in educators. Until this study, however, research had not been conducted on the integrity given to the DPPE curriculum when it is transferred from university to school system contexts. Thus, this study addresses the degree of fidelity employed, and the concerns expressed, by public school facilitators as they assume responsibility for implementing the DPPE curriculum innovation. Three quantitative research questions scrutinize the degree of implementation fidelity through an examination of verbal interaction patterns, stages of concern, and core component fidelity. A fourth qualitative research question is employed to ascertain the facilitators' rationale in either maintaining fidelity or introducing changes to the DPPE curriculum innovation. Findings from this study indicate that the DPPE's instructional and curriculum core components were implemented with a high degree of fidelity. Additionally, facilitators indicated peak Stage — 5 Collaboration concerns, indicating focused attention and energy toward coordinated and collaborative facilitation efforts. Verbal interaction patterns differed with regard to direct and indirect facilitator talk, but the percentages of learner engagement and response opportunities were closely aligned with university facilitator standards. Finally, qualitative data indicate significant attention given to the DPPE teacher participants, with adaptations to the DPPE curriculum innovation centering on their participants' expressed concerns and needs. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | etd-03172006-073702 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/4226 | |
| dc.rights | I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report. | en_US |
| dc.subject | implementation | en_US |
| dc.subject | fidelity | en_US |
| dc.subject | DPPE | en_US |
| dc.subject | educational innovations | en_US |
| dc.title | Implementation Fidelity and Facilitator Concerns in the Process of Disseminating a Deliberate Psychological and Professional Education Innovation | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
