Faculty Outcomes from Industry-University Collaboration

dc.contributor.advisorDr. Denis O. Gray, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Samuel B. Pond, III, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Catherine R. Zimmer, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorMeagher, Beth Marieen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T18:07:51Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T18:07:51Z
dc.date.issued2002-05-24en_US
dc.degree.disciplinePsychologyen_US
dc.degree.levelthesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSen_US
dc.descriptionNorth Carolina State University Theses Psychology.
dc.description.abstractA large amount of research and development in the United States takes place at universities. In spite of the great number of research projects that have been done on industry-university research collaboration and industry-university research centers, the university faculty member has been relatively neglected in these studies. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to determine what information was available about faculty involved in industry-university collaboration. Limitations of the literature are discussed. Though the literature provides a general description of faculty involvement in industry-university collaboration, there is a strong need for further research in this area. This study sought to determine the kinds of benefits and outcomes that faculty members receive from their involvement in industry-university research centers and whether these benefits predict outcomes related to publications and satisfaction. Faculty from industry-university research centers nationwide were surveyed about their center involvement. Results showed variables at three organizational levels, the university, the center, and the individual, predicted satisfaction and scholarly productivity of the faculty member. The receipt of benefits by the faculty member (such as support for graduate students, access to equipment, opportunities for consulting, opportunities for research contracts, chances for promotion and tenure, and interaction with faculty) positively influenced outcomes related to satisfaction, theses and dissertations, total publications and presentations, publications and presentations with students, and publications and presentations with member scientists. Further, faculty symmetry with industry also predicted satisfaction and scholarly productivity.en_US
dc.formatThesis (M.S.)--North Carolina State University.
dc.identifier.otheretd-05152002-102758en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/1815
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectindustry-universityen_US
dc.subjectfaculty satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectcollaborationen_US
dc.subjectscholarly productivityen_US
dc.subjectresearch centersen_US
dc.titleFaculty Outcomes from Industry-University Collaborationen_US
dcterms.abstractKeywords: industry-university, faculty satisfaction, collaboration, scholarly productivity, research centers.
dcterms.extentix, 152 pages : illustrations

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
604.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections