Managers' Perceptions of the Website Development Field: The Process of Creation and the People Involved

dc.contributor.advisorDiane Chapman, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorBrad Mehlenbacher, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorJason Swarts, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorGottlieb, Jacquelyn C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T18:04:40Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T18:04:40Z
dc.date.issued2005-10-23en_US
dc.degree.disciplineTraining and Developmenten_US
dc.degree.levelthesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSen_US
dc.description.abstractThis qualitative study is based upon the responses of three Web designers and three managers employed in student services departments at a Southeastern U.S. University. The purpose of the research has been to describe managers' perceptions of the Website development field with respect to their preconceived notion of what is a Website, reasons why to create one, and intended use. These perceptions helped lead me towards the ability to further understand managers' communication patterns and expectations of Web designers. The research was focused on established organizational development theories, in particular, cross-boundary communication challenges between employees from different disciplinary cultures. It was found that, in many ways, Web designers and managers expect similar qualities in one another. Likewise, all participants similarly valued Websites. The challenge was that they perceived each other as having different expectations and felt frustration from experiencing their manager or Web designer 'speaking different languages.' All managers agreed that some level of understanding of Website development, including HTML knowledge, is necessary for a manager to have the ability to communicate well with their Web designer. Web designers also agreed that managers need some understanding of Website development, but knowledge of HTML is not necessary. Web designers having effective communication skills and understanding their business were the biggest expectations by the managers. Although there was agreement about the significant role their Websites' played in their businesses, there appeared to be a lack of formal strategic planning. Each participant realized the vast skills necessary for Website design and the lack of available resources, yet the concept of a Website development team was not explicitly prevalent. There seemed to be a more implicit understanding through the division of tasks via acknowledging different job titles. The Web designer was seen primarily as a visual designer and not expected to have the same skills as other titled Web developers such as an Information and Communication Specialist. Since all participants saw Website creation as continuing to become more complicated, they voiced their belief that Web designers are not qualified enough to design what may be the future of Websites. Managers seem to be expecting their Websites created in such a way that those staff members without HTML knowledge can easily update the content. T he aspect of Website creation that was a big dilemma for all was who owned and maintained the content. The Web designers agreed with the managers that Web designers are not expected to be responsible for content creation. Managers claimed that Web designers don't have the skills or interest in content. Web designers only acknowledged that their role was formatting content for the Web. Ultimately all participants wanted the same thing—to be able to communicate well with one another to create an effective and useful Website. All believed they were decent communicators. All managers felt their Web designers spoke another language and had different priorities in mind. The Web designers felt it was their manager who couldn't seem to communicate well or able to focus on the correct priorities of Website design.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-07252005-161759en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/1511
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectmanagers perceptions of Websitesen_US
dc.subjectdisciplinary culturesen_US
dc.subjectcross-boundary communicationen_US
dc.subjectWebsite designen_US
dc.subjectmanaging Websitesen_US
dc.subjectmanagersen_US
dc.subjectWebsite developmenten_US
dc.subjectWeb designersen_US
dc.subjectqualitativeen_US
dc.subjectinterviewsen_US
dc.subjectWebsiteen_US
dc.subjectcross-discipline culturesen_US
dc.subjectcommunication between managers and web designersen_US
dc.subjectcommunicationen_US
dc.subjectWeb design job titlesen_US
dc.subjectweb design job descriptionsen_US
dc.titleManagers' Perceptions of the Website Development Field: The Process of Creation and the People Involveden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
1.73 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections