Optimization of Ionic Crosslinking

dc.contributor.advisorDr. Behnam Pourdeyhimi, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Brent Smith, Committee Co-Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Peter Hauser, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.authorThomason, Spencer Trexleren_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T18:14:31Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T18:14:31Z
dc.date.issued2007-05-10en_US
dc.degree.disciplineTextile Chemistryen_US
dc.degree.levelthesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSen_US
dc.description.abstractDurable press treatment with formaldehyde-based finishes produce excellent durable press performance, however they also significantly reduce the strength of the fabric and release formaldehyde, a suspected human carcinogen. Ionic crosslinking has been explored as a potential alternative for durable press treatment. Previous work has shown significant improvements in wrinkle recovery angle with carboxymethylation and ionic crosslinking of cotton fabric with cationic glycerin. Optimal conditions from previous work are further optimized and evaluated. This research models the effect of this treatment on a number of physical and chemical properties of the fabric. With selected ionic treatments, wet wrinkle recovery angles (WRA) can be increased by 83% and dry WRA can be increased by 19%. The durable press (DP) performance only increased slightly with these treatments on this fabric. There is a weak correlation between WRA and DP performance. Under certain conditions, this treatment improved WRA and DP performance, but not nearly as much as DMDHEU treatment. The treatment can produce tensile strength increases of up to 25%, breaking strain increases of up to 340%, and tear strength increases of up to 80%. This is in sharp contrast to decreases in each of these properties with DMDHEU treatment. Whiteness index (WI) of carboxymethylated and ionically crosslinked fabrics were only slightly lower than untreated fabric, while DMDHEU causes a considerable reduction in WI. Fabrics could be produced with this treatment with stiffness similar to untreated fabric, whereas DMDHEU treatment always results in considerable stiffness increase. Ionic treatment can produce a slight increase in DP performance with none of the adverse affects which are observed with traditional finishes.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-05042006-142014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/2498
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectpermanent pressen_US
dc.subjectionic crosslinkingen_US
dc.subjectdurable pressen_US
dc.subjectcarboxymethylationen_US
dc.titleOptimization of Ionic Crosslinkingen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections