Pollination Biology of the Federally Endangered Echinacea laevigata (Boynton and Beadle) Blake, Smooth Coneflower, in Small, Isolated Populations

dc.contributor.advisorDr. John Meyer, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Ted Shear, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Jon Stucky, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.authorGadd, Laura Elizabethen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T18:08:30Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T18:08:30Z
dc.date.issued2006-07-27en_US
dc.degree.disciplineBotanyen_US
dc.degree.levelthesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSen_US
dc.description.abstractEchinacea laevigata (Boynton and Beadle) Blake, a federally endangered species, occurs in several small, isolated populations and a single large population in the northern Piedmont of North Carolina. Currently, little is known of the reproductive biology of this species. Therefore, we sought to describe its flowering phenology, compatibility pattern, and which of its various flower visitors were the more effective pollinators, to inform conservation efforts. In addition, pollinator limitation can reduce seed number and seed quality in small, isolated plant populations. We conducted a study of insect flower visitation and seed production in these populations to test our hypothesis that plants in the small, isolated populations are visited by fewer insect taxa, receive fewer visits, and produce fewer and/or less fit seeds than do plants in the large population. Our data show that average insect visitor species richness was significantly greater in the large population than in small populations and all but one of the small populations had fewer pollinator visits per head during fifteen minute observations than the large population; however, plants in several small populations produced as many or more seeds per head than did plants in the large population. Therefore, our results were not consistent with expectations of pollinator limitation. However, results show that seeds from small populations produce seedlings that are less fit as those from the large population. We conclude that other factors not examined in this study are more threatening to small, isolated coneflower populations than is pollinator limitation.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-04262006-195943en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/1884
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectpollinatorsen_US
dc.subjectEchinacea laevigataen_US
dc.subjectflowering phenologyen_US
dc.subjectreproductive biologyen_US
dc.titlePollination Biology of the Federally Endangered Echinacea laevigata (Boynton and Beadle) Blake, Smooth Coneflower, in Small, Isolated Populationsen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
197.05 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections