Seismic Design of Vertically Irregular Reinforced Concrete Structures

dc.contributor.advisorDr. James M. Nau, Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. John M. Hanson, Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Paul Zia, Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. C.C. Tung, Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorDas, Satrajiten_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T19:20:59Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T19:20:59Z
dc.date.issued2000-08-30en_US
dc.degree.disciplineCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.degree.levelPhD Dissertationen_US
dc.degree.namePhDen_US
dc.description.abstractSeismic building codes, such as the Uniform Building Code (UBC) do not allow the equivalent lateral force (ELF) procedure to be used for structures with vertical irregularities. The UBC defines a structure to be irregular based on the ratio of magnitudes of either strength, stiffness, mass, setback or offset of one floor to that of an adjacent floor. The criteria defining the limits of irregularity are somewhat arbitrary, but are introduced in the code to provide unambiguous, enforceable provisions. The purpose of this study is to quantify the definition of irregular structures for four different vertical irregularities - stiffness, strength, mass and nonstructural masonry infills. A total of 87 building structures with interstory stiffness and strength ratios ranging from 0.09 to 1.89 and 0.27 to 1.07, respectively, and mass ratios of 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 are considered for a detailed parametric study. The lateral force resisting systems (LFRS) considered are special moment resisting frames and shear walls. These LFRS's are designed based on the forces obtained from the equivalent lateral force procedure. An ELF) analysis. Finally, nonlinear dynamic analysis is performed in order to assess the seismic performance of these buildings. The results show that the restrictions on the applicability of the equivalent lateral force procedure are unnecessarily conservative for irregular structures. Most structures considered in this study, designed on the basis of the ELF approach, perform reasonably well. In some cases, however, there is an initiation of an undesirable collapse mechanism. It is recommended that capacity based criteria in the design phase be appropriately used in the vicinity of the irregularity in order to ensure desired performance and behavior.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-20000820-165307en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/5846
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.titleSeismic Design of Vertically Irregular Reinforced Concrete Structuresen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
6.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections