Predicting Fuel Models and Subsequent Fire Behavior from Vegetation Classification Maps

dc.contributor.advisorDr. Stacy A. C. Nelson, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. E. Carlyle Franklin, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Hugh A. Devine, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Mark Prestonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T17:58:18Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T17:58:18Z
dc.date.issued2003-09-02en_US
dc.degree.disciplineNatural Resourcesen_US
dc.degree.levelthesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSen_US
dc.description.abstractThe recent trends in wildland fires have created a level of motivation that requires natural resource managers to predict fires through the use of computer based simulation programs. Using vegetation maps delineated from large-scale aerial photography and fuel loading values collected from fieldwork, I simulated how fire would react to changes in fuel model assignments for Booker T. Washington National Monument (BOWA) and George Washington Birthplace National Monument using FARSITE, a fire simulation program. The environments for these fires were based on weather and fuel conditions found during the summer and fall months for each area. Sample points, stratified by vegetation formation, were selected. Then, field measurements using Brown's transect lines and Burgan and Rothermel ocular procedures were used to calculate the amount of fuel loading in tons/acre for each sample point. These values were then used to assign a fuel load to each vegetation formation class. Then each vegetation polygon on the map was assigned one of the thirteen National Fire Fuel Laboratory fuel models based on fuel load, vegetation type, and overall structure of the surrounding area. The sampling results showed a one to one correspondence of fuel model to vegetation formation. The sensitivity of FARSITE was tested by changing fuel model layers within FARSITE while holding all other variables constant (e.g., weather, moisture, etc.). Rate of spread and fire line intensity were used to compare the differences between the simulations using different fuel models. The results from the simulations showed that there was little sensitivity to changes in the assignment of fuel models for forested vegetation for these sites. The rate of spread and fire line intensity for grass fuel models showed sensitivity to changes in fuel model assignment.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-08122003-152132en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/778
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectFARSITEen_US
dc.subjectmodelsen_US
dc.subjectloadingen_US
dc.subjectfireen_US
dc.subjectgisen_US
dc.subjectfuelen_US
dc.titlePredicting Fuel Models and Subsequent Fire Behavior from Vegetation Classification Mapsen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
4.63 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections