Shallow Groundwater Nitrate and Breeding Bird Habitat in a Riparian Buffer Restored by Volunteer Vegetation

dc.contributor.advisorDr. J. Wendell Gilliam, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Jon M. Stucky, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Deanna L. Osmond, Committee Chairen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Christopher E. Moorman, Committee Memberen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Timothy Adrienen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-02T17:56:41Z
dc.date.available2010-04-02T17:56:41Z
dc.date.issued2005-07-24en_US
dc.degree.disciplineSoil Scienceen_US
dc.degree.levelthesisen_US
dc.degree.nameMSen_US
dc.description.abstractResearch has indicated that riparian buffers can be effective sinks for nitrate (NO3-N) in agricultural environments, however there is uncertainty regarding specific characteristics necessary for optimal buffer performance such as buffer width and vegetation type. This research evaluated the effect of increasing buffer width from 9 to 30 m by allowing fallow vegetation to occupy the riparian zone in an attempt to reduce NO3-N discharge to stream water draining the swine effluent irrigated site located in the Middle Coastal Plain of North Carolina. Buffer functions were assessed by comparing groundwater NO3-N concentrations from the 30-m zone to the same area prior to buffer widening. Increases in percent NO3-N reduction from the buffer edge to stream bank of up to 95% were observed in both shallow (0.8 to 1.2 m deep; p=0.02) and deep (2.4 to 4.5 m deep; p=0.003) groundwater on the east side of the stream and also in shallow groundwater on the west side of stream, although not statistically significant (p=0.2). The increases in NO3-N reduction were most likely due to increases in dissolved organic C (DOC) supplemented by riparian vegetation. Reduction in deep groundwater on the east side of stream significantly decreased (19.5% to ?5.1%; p=0.05) following widening, suggesting that the deeper confining layer along this side minimized the effects of buffer widening on groundwater DOC and hence NO3-N reduction. Stream sampling indicated no significant difference in upstream and downstream NO3-N levels between the two buffer widths (p=0.61). Riparian buffers can be valuable refuge areas for wildlife in otherwise homogeneous agricultural landscapes. Three different buffer management practices, i) planted woody vegetation, ii) volunteer shrub vegetation, and iii) volunteer three-zone grass, shrub, and woody vegetation, were evaluated for their effects on avian habitat using breeding bird counts and vegetation surveys. The bird community at each site was highly dependent on the types of vegetation present. The highest species richness and total detections were observed in the three-zone buffer during 2002 (30 species; 84 detections/census day/1000 m) and 2003 (22 species; 64 detections/census day/1000 m) sampling periods. Differences in site characteristics such as buffer width, length, and land management likely affected the results; however these data suggest that restoration of riparian areas by allowing fallow vegetation to populate the zone is at the very least equally beneficial to avian wildlife as is restoration by planting specific grass, shrub, and tree species.en_US
dc.identifier.otheretd-04172005-194033en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/556
dc.rightsI hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to NC State University or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.en_US
dc.subjectvegetation managementen_US
dc.subjectagricultural best management practicesen_US
dc.subjectnitrateen_US
dc.subjectwater qualityen_US
dc.subjectbirdsen_US
dc.subjectbuffer restorationen_US
dc.subjectwildlife habitaten_US
dc.subjectdenitrificationen_US
dc.subjectbuffer widthen_US
dc.subjectgroundwateren_US
dc.titleShallow Groundwater Nitrate and Breeding Bird Habitat in a Riparian Buffer Restored by Volunteer Vegetationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
etd.pdf
Size:
1.33 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections